Dating the Exodus, The Hyksos Expulsion of 1540/1530 B.C.E.?
06 Feb. 2001
Revisions through 11 May 2008
Please click here for this website's most important article: Why the Bible Cannot be the Word of God.
For Christians visiting this website my most important article is:
The Reception of God's Holy Spirit: How the Hebrew Prophets _contradict_ Christianity's Teachings.
I highly reccomend to the reader, "Dating the Exodus," a ThD dissertation by Dr. Stephen C. Meyers (1997, Trinity Evangelical Seminary, Florida), which discusses various proposals for the Exodus' date using Jewish and Non-Jewish sources in addition to the biblical evidence. He favors the Hyksos Expulsion as being behind the Exodus traditions, and notes this was the common understanding of the Early Christian period. cf. the following url: http://www.bibleandscience.com/archaeology/exodusdate.htm
Another reccomended article is by David Goldstein (published 24 July 2006) titled "Of Pharaohs and Dates: Critical Remarks on the Dating and Historicity of the Exodus From Egypt." He calculates an Exodus as occurring circa 1447 or 1528 BCE (the latter of which by _my calculations_ falls in the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos). His article, however, primarily critiques a 1312 BCE Exodus date (found in the Rabbinical Seder Olam Rabbah) espoused by Jonathan Adler, "Dating the Exodus: A New Perspective." pp. 44-51, in the journal Jewish Bible Quarterly 23 (1995). cf. the following url: http://www.talkreason.org/PrinterFriendly.cfm?article=/articles/exodus1.cfm
Please click here for another very fine article by Wikipedia on the Exodus and the "problems" facing scholars in identifying when it occurred.
Special note on dating terminology: B.C. means "Before Christ" while B.C.E. meaning "Before the Common Era," is preferred by some scholars.
Also reccomended:
Please click here for the evidence that the Pentateuch, which includes the Exodus account is _not_ a reliable eyewitness account regarding the events it attests to.
This article has seen a sudden increase in "visits" over the past 7 days apparently as a result of Simcha Jacobovici's TV documentary The Exodus Decoded (Televised 20, 24, 26 August 2006 here in Massachusetts on the History Channel).
For a detailed point-by-point critique of Jacobovici's Exodus Decoded by Chris Heard of Pepperdine College
Jacobovici associated the Exodus with the Hyksos Expulsion and dated the event to ca. 1500 BCE (B.C.E.=Before the Common Era, an alternate scholarly designation for B.C.=Before Christ). Jacobovici was apparently aware that some scholars dated the Exodus to circa 1446 BCE on the basis of 1 Kings 6:1 chronology. He was also aware that the Hyksos Expulsion associated with Pharaoh Ahmose I was a mid 16th century BCE event and that almost 100 years separated the Hyksos expulsion from the 1446 BCE Exodus date, and that because of this discrepancy, some scholars had rejected the Exodus as being a Hyksos Expulsion.
What Jacobovici _was not aware of_ was that the Catholic scholar Eusebius as preserved by Jerome fixed the Exodus at circa 1512 B.C., just 12 years earlier than Jacobovici's circa 1500 B.C. Exodus date (cf. below).
Jacobovici was also apparently _unaware_ that a number of scholars had come to the conclusion that the 1446 BCE date preserved in 1 Kings 6:1 appeared to be CONTRADICTED by internal data preserved in the books of Joshua, Judges, 1st and 2d Samuel and Kings (as well as Acts 13:16-22). When this data was factored in with Solomon's 4th year (circa 966 BCE when the Jerusalem Temple was begun to be built), it yielded an Exodus falling in the reign of Ahmose I. This data better aligns the Hyksos Expulsion with the Exodus than Jacobovici's 1500 BCE Exodus date which was simply _his attempt_ to bring the 1446 BCE Exodus "somewhat closer in time" to Ahmose I and the Hyksos Expulsion.
My below article notes that a number of scholars, Josephus (79 AD?), Jack (1925), De Vries (1962), Hoffmeier (1996), Kitchen (2003) and Goldstein (2006) and "others" have observed that 1 Kings 6:1's statement that 480 years elapsed from the Exodus and the 4th year of Solomon's reign appears to be CONTRADICTED by the internal chonological evidence of the Bible, suggesting almost 600 years elapsed not 480 years. I have noted that when this data is added to Solomon's 4th year reckoned by some as ca. 966/967 BCE, the Exodus falls in the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos.
Please be advised that I _now_ understand that a "conflation and fusion" exists of events appearing in the Bible's Exodus narratives: Sites like Arad and Ai which were destroyed in the 3rd millennium BCE, the Hyksos expulsion of 1540-1530 BCE, Ramesside Era events in the Sinai and Arabah, and places existing only in Late Iron II, 640-562 BCE. Mainstream scholarship understands Israel's settling of the Hill Country is Iron I, ca. 1230-1130 BCE based on archaeological findings. Why then does the Bible's chronology have an Exodus "hundreds of years" earlier?
The answer is very surprising and has been preserved for almost 2000 years in the writings of an Egyptian priest/historian called Manetho. He wrote a history of Egypt in the 3rd century BCE for his Hellenistic Greek overlord Ptolemy II. He noted that TWO EXPULSIONS occurred in Egypt's history of Asiatics. The first was of the Hyksos of the mid 16th century and then another in the Ramesside era. He understood that the Hyksos fled to and settled at Jerusalem, but that 592 or 612 years later (Josephus' two reckonings) "their descendants" reinvaded Egypt, resettling at the town they had been expelled from earlier called Avaris. After 13 years of "lording it" over the eastern delta, the Ramessides expelled the Hyksos' descendants a SECOND TIME, and they eventually again settled at Jerusalem. The Jewish historian Josephus (1st century CE) was adamant that the 16th century expulsion was the Exodus based on _his calculations_ of the Bible's chronology and furious that Manetho had said the Exodus was preserved in a Ramesside expulsion! Modern archaeology has established the Israelite settlement of the Canaanite Hill Country from Galilee to the Negev as portrayed in the Bible, was in Ramesside times. Please click here for my article on Manetho vs. Josephus on the dating of the Exodus. If Manetho is correct, that Avaris was resettled by Canaanites in Ramesside times, and expelled again in that era, perhaps this answers the "great mystery" as to why the pottery of the IRON IA settlements is _Canaanite_ in appearance and _not_ Egyptian? The answer: 13 years was apparently too short a period of time for the "reinvading" Canaanite descendants of the Hyksos to adopt Egyptian potting techniques. They probably cast their Canaanite pots in Egypt and still were casting them in the "Canaanite manner" when they settled AGAIN near Jerusalem in the Hill Country. Not until Egypt abandoned Canaan circa 1130 BCE under Ramesses VI was the land wide-open for conquest by Philistines and Israelites. The "original" article, below, will remain intact with some minor revisions and updates, but is _superceded_ by the above observations of Josephus and Manetho.
One of the "first" problems to be faced is that the Bible exists today in several CONTRADICTING recensions which provide "different dates" for the creation of the world and the Exodus. One often sees the date of 1445 BC for the Exodus at many Protestant Evangelical Websites. This date is based on the chronology developed in the 17th century AD by Archbishop James Ussher of Ireland, which later in the 18th century appears in the margins of numerous King James Version Bibles (the KJV began printing in 1611 AD). Ussher calculated Creation at 4004 BC.
The Catholic Bible is, in part, a recension of the Septuaginta believed to have been compiled at Alexandria Egypt in Greek for Jews by Jews in the 3rd century BC. Catholic scholars fix creation at 5199 BC instead of 4004 BC. Why? Because the Septuagint gives different ages for the pre-Flood patriachs which are in CONTRADICTION to ages preserved in the King James Bible.
The data preserved in modern Jewish text the TANAKH also called the Massoretic Text has creation calculated at 3740 BC in the Rabbinical Seder 'Olam Rabbah.
Professor Steibing on three different and _CONTRADICTING_ dates for God's creation of the world in the book of Genesis as calculated by various Jewish, Catholic and Protestant scholars (brackets [] are mine):
"Most scholars [prior to the 19th century AD] agreed that the world was only about six thousand years old, though there was considerable disagreement over the exact date of the creation. Jewish rabbinical calculations from the Hebrew Massoretic Text showed that the world began 3,740 years before the Christian Era. Roman Catholic tradition, based on the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible, placed the creation in 5199 B.C. And most English-speaking Protestants accepted the seventeenth-century Archbishop James Ussher's calculation of the time of creation, 4004 B.C. Ussher's dates were placed in the margins of early eighteenth-century editions of the King James version of the Bible, making them seem even more authoritive." (p. 32. "The Discovery of Prehistory." William H. Steibing Jr. Uncovering the Past. New York & Oxford. Oxford University Press. 1994 [1993 Prometheus Books])
Thus Protestant Christian Evangelicals set the Exodus at circa 1445 BC using Ussher's chronology, the Roman Catholics set the Exodus at circa 1512 BC and the Jewish TANAKH's data which appears in the Rabbinical work called Seder 'Olam Rabbah calculates the Exodus at 1312 BC. For the 1512 BC Exodus date cf. page 190; for 1312 BC cf. p. 111 in Jack Finegan. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, Massachusetts. Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. 1964, 1998 Revised Edition. ISBN 1-56563-143-9).
The Roman Catholic Exodus date of 1512 BC falls in the reign of Pharaoh Tuthmoses II (reigned circa 1518-1504 BC); The Protestant Evangelicals' Exodus date from the King James Version of 1445 BC falls in the reign of Pharaoh Amenhotep II (reigned ca. 1453-1419 BC); the Rabbinical Seder 'Olam Rabah's Exodus date of ca. 1312 BC falls in the reign of Pharaoh Horemhab (reigned ca. 1321-1293 BC), he being succeeded by Ramesses I (reigned ca. 1293-1291 BC). Note all Pharaonic reigns are from Peter A. Clayton. Chronicle of the Pharaohs, The Reign-by-reign Record of the Rulers and Dynasties of Ancient Egypt. London. Thames & Hudson. 1994. ISBN 0-500-05074-0.
Anyone who has studied the chronology issues and problems arising in Biblical as well as Egyptological studies is well aware that a consensus does _not_ exist for any "hard dates" in regards to when the Exodus occured (if it occured) or just when the Hyksos Expulsion happened. For the Exodus we have two major proposals 1445 BCE (based on statements made in 1 Kings 6:1) favored by many Conservative Protestant Scholars, and 1250 BCE championed by numerous Liberals. There are other dates, but they have far fewer adherents.
In 1985 R. Krauss argued that the 9th year of Amenhotep I, noting a rising of the Sothis star, if viewed from Aswan (ancient Elephantine) would indicate that the 18th Dynasty was founded ca. 1539 BCE (Sothis und Monddaten, HAB 20. Hildesheim). Other Scholars have argued the viewing might have been from Thebes, which was then the capital (cf. Vol. 2. p. 329, K. A. Kitchen, "Egypt, History of (Chronology)." David Noel Freedman, Editor. The Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York. Doubleday. 1992). In favor of Aswan, is that the Sothis is associated with predictions of Nile floods, and Aswan has Nilometers to predict the degree of flooding in the Delta. Those favoring a Thebean sighting of Sothis, argue for 1550 BCE being the founding date of the 18th Dynasty.
Some have associated the foundation date of the New Dynasty with the expulsion of the Hyksos from the Delta. Before 1985 (when Krauss made his proposal) earlier dates for the 18th Dynasty's founding were in favor, 1580 or 1570 BCE. Now, 1550 or 1540/39 BCE appear in scholarly articles as founding dates alongside 1570 BCE (its all rather confusing).
Manfred Bietak, the excavator of Tell el-Daba (believed to be the Hyksos capital called Avaris in Egypt), has suggested the city came to end ca. 1530 BCE (emphasis mine):
"An enormous increase in Cypriot pottery...can be observed in strata D/3-2 (ca. 1600-1530 BC)." (p. 85. Manfred Bietak. Avaris, The Capital of the Hyksos, Recent Excavations at Tell el-Dab`a. London. British Museum Press. 1996. ISBN 0-7141-0968-1 pbk).
This date is favored by William G. Dever (emphasis mine):
"Tell el-Dab`a was, in fact the Hyksos capital of Avaris, destroyed ca. 1530 BCE with the expulsion of the Hyksos at the beginning of the 18th Dynasty." (p.71, William G. Dever. "Is There Any Archaeological Evidence For The Exodus?" Ernest S. Frerichs & Leonard H. Lesko. Editors. Exodus, The Egyptian Evidence. Winona Lake, Indiana. Eisenbrauns. 1997. ISBN 1-57506-025-6. hdbk).
Bietak posits that Avaris fell in Ahmose's 15th or 18th year as he has the city falling 1530 BCE, he evidently dates Ahmose's first regnal year as circa 1548 or 1545 BCE:
"...Ahmose. He had conquered Avaris most probably after the fifteenth or even eighteenth year of his reign." (p. 81. Bietak, citing in footnote 144, Franke, 1988, p. 264. Manfred Bietak. Avaris, The Capital of the Hyksos, Recent Excavations at Tell el-Dab`a. London. British Museum Press. 1996. ISBN 0-7141-0968-1 pbk)
Kenneth Kitchen and James Hoffmeier favor Ahmose's reign as ca. 1550-1525 BCE (placing the end of the Hyksos dynasty as either 1550 or 1540 BCE), Krauss prefers 1539-1514 BCE for Ahmoses' reign (cf. Vol. 2. p. 329, K.A. Kitchen, "Egypt, History of (Chronology)." David Noel Freedman, Editor. The Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York. Doubleday. 1992).
Of interest here is that Goldstein's reading of chronological data preserved in Judges and Kings leads him to conclude the Exodus is being dated either circa 1447 BCE or circa 1528 BCE; I note Kitchen's lowest date for Ahmose I is 1525 BCE while Krauss' lowest date for Ahmose I is 1514 BCE. Worth noting though, is that Goldstein _never_ makes the observation that 1528 BCE falls within the reign Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos, in fact, he does not attempt to identify what Pharaoh this date aligns with because his major focus is in refuting the notion of an Exodus ca. 1312 BCE as preserved in the Rabbinical Seder Olam Rabbah..
Goldstein (emphasis mine):
"However, things are not so simple. For in fact, beside the summary figure of 480 years from the Exodus to the building of the Jerusalem Temple--which equals 476 years from the Exodus to the enthronement of Solomon-- the Bible provides more detailed chronological data for the same period. The bulk of these data comes from the book of Judges, which lists the alternating periods of alien domination over Israel and independent rule by Israelite judges, with the total length of these periods adding up to at least 410 years. The period bridging between the Exodus and the commencement of the era of the Judges (with the death of Joshua the son of Nun) comprises 40 years of the Israelites' wanderings in the desert prior to the arrival to the eastern bank of the Jordan river (Exodus 16:35, Numbers 14:33-34, 32:13, Deuteronomy 1:3, 2:7, 8:2-4, 29:4) and the leadership of Joshua, which must have lasted at least 5 years. The period bridging the end of the era of the Judges (as described in the book of Judges) and the enthronement of Solomon comprises 40 years of the leadership of Eli
( 1 Samuel 4:18), 20 years of the people following the Lord under Samuel (1 Samuel 7:2), 2 years of Saul's reign (1 Samuel 13:1), and 40 years of David's reign (2 Samuel 5:4). So, according to these detailed chronological data, the period from the Exodus to the enthronement of Solomon must have spanned at least 40+5+40+20+2+40= 557 years, which would place the Exodus c. 1528 BCE. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 81 years between the two biblical dates for the Exodus, and the later of these dates (1447 BCE) is 135 years earlier than the rabbinic date for the Exodus, based on Seder Olam Rabbah (1312 BCE). These discrepancies should be always kept in mind...the chronological scheme presented in the Bible itself... points to the date of c. 1447 BCE or c. 1528 BCE for the Exodus."
Another complication is disagreement about Solomon's fourth year, when the Temple was begun (1 Kings 6:1 claiming 480 years elapsed from the Exodus to the Temple's founding). Two dates are currently favored for the start of Solomon's reign, 970 or 960 BCE, his reign ending 930 or 920 BCE:
"...chronological notes in the biblical sources, lead scholars to assume the beginning of Solomon's reign around 970-960 and its end around 930-920 BC."
(Vol. 6, p. 105, Tomoo Ishida, "Solomon." David Noel Freedman, Editor. The Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York. Doubleday. 1992)
Utilizing these currently popular dates, Solomon's fourth year is either 966 or 956 BCE.
To recapitulate, prior to 1985, 1580 BCE or 1570 BCE were popular founding dates for the 18th Dynasty under Pharoah Ahmose I. Since the 1985 proposal by Krauss either 1550 or 1540/39 BCE seem to be favored-
My research has revealed that the sacred writings of the Jews and Early Christians preserve a date of 1540 BCE for the Exodus which just happens to match co-incidentally, the 1540 BCE currently held "alternate-end-date" of the Hyksos 15th Dynasty (the Hyksos Expulsion by Paharoh Ahmoses I) favored by Egyptologists Kenneth A. Kitchen and James K. Hoffmeier (cf. p. xviiii, "Chronological Charts." James K. Hoffmeier. Israel in Egypt, The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. New York. Oxford University Press. 1996. ISBN 0-19-513088-X pbk).
I note that Amihai Mazar seems to also favor a Hyksos expulsion ca. 1540 BCE (emphasis mine):
"It appears to me that a general division of the entire MBII period into three phases (A, B, C) is well documented on the basis of stratigraphy, pottery typology, and development of other artifacts...the third phase- MBIIC correlates with the Hyksos Fifteenth Dynasty (until 1540)."
(p.195, Amihai Mazar. Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, 10,000- 586 BCE. New York. Doubleday. 1990. ISBN 0-385-23970-X hdbk.)
We will now explore in greater depth the complexities and contradictions to be faced and overcome in establishing the date of the Exodus.
Hoffmeier, in reviewing a history of attempts to pinpoint the date of the Exodus, mentions the work of Jack (James W. Jack. The Date of the Exodus in the Light of External Evidence. Edinburgh, Scotland. T & T Clark. 1925):
"...James Jack argued for a mid-fifteenth century date based on biblical data and what he believed to corroborating Egyptian evidence. Based on the Masoretic text of 1 Kings 6:1, which dates the departure from Egypt at 480 years before Solomon's fourth regnal year, Jack concluded that 1445 B.C. was the Exodus date since Solomon's acession date, 970 BC could be securely fixed (his fourth year being 966/967), thanks to synchronisms between Biblical and Assyrian texts." (p.124, Hoffmeier)
Hoffmeier noted that the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) gives 440 years instead of 480 years. (p.124. James K. Hoffmeier. Israel in Egypt, The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. New York. Oxford University Press. 1996. ISBN 0-19-513088-X pbk).
Hoffmeier also observed that Jack was aware that a careful reading of the Masoretic texts revealed an elapsed period exceeding 480 years (emphasis mine):
"However, as Jack showed, if all the periods are added together, such as the forty years in Sinai, the lengths of the Judges, and periods of peace between the Judges, plus the length of David's reign, the total is 534 years. On top of this figure, the duration of Joshua's leadership in Canaan and the length of Saul's kingship, which are not preserved, bring the total close to six hundred years."
(p.125. James K. Hoffmeier. Israel in Egypt, The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. New York. Oxford University Press. 1996. ISBN 0-19-513088-X pbk).
According to Professor Mariottini Professor Hoffmeier has suggested 630 or 650 years may have elapsed from the Exodus to Solomon's 4th year and the building of the Temple at Jerusalem. By adding these years to 966/967 B.C. (Solomon's 4th year) we arrive at an Exodus date of 1596 or 1616 B.C. when the Hyksos were in power in Egypt.
Mariottini (27 July 2007):
"Prof. Hoffmeier correctly points out that the dates found in the book of Joshua through 1 Kings do not add up to 480 years. Prof. Hoffmeier calculated the number of years for Joshua, the judges and the kings of Israel up to Solomon and the numbers added up to 630-650 years. Those who accept a 15th-century date for the Exodus, have to harmonize the text by presupposing overlaps in the years some of the judges ruled in Israel...Prof. Hoffmeier says that the biblical data would put the Exodus during the Hyksos’ occupation of Egypt."
("The Date of the Exodus." 27 July 2007. Professor Claude Mariottini of Northern Baptist Seminary, Lombard, Illinois.
Romer (1988) on the Hyksos expulsion being the only known "exodus" of Asiatics from Egypt in his discussion of the Hebrew Exodus and its possible attestation in extra-biblical records:
"Theban royal texts tell of their final victories over the northerners in the 1530's B.C....The victory inscriptions of these southern pharaohs tell us they threw these foreigners out of Egypt then pursued them to Canaan and beyond. And this is the only foreign mass-migration, an exodus from ancient Egypt, for which there is any evidence at all in the archaeological records."
(p. 48. John Romer. Testament: The Bible and History. New York. Henry Holt & Company. 1988)
Later scholars, like Jack, have noted that 1 Kings 6:1 states that 480 years elapsed from the Exodus to the fourth year of Solomon's reign and the building of the Temple. Some scholars date Solomon's fourth year to circa 966 BCE, by adding 480 years to this date and come up with an Exodus circa 1446 BCE. Kitchen has sounded a note of warning though about the above equation, pointing out, like Jack, that a period in excess of 553 years appears to be warranted instead of 480 years:
Kitchen (emphasis mine):
"The lazy man's solution is simply to cite the 480 years ostensibly given in 1 Kings 6:1 from the Exodus to the 4th year of Solomon (ca. 966 BC). However, this too simple solution is ruled out by the combined weight of all
the other biblical dadta plus additional information from external data. So the interval of time from the Exodus comes out not at 480 years but as over 553 years (BY THREE UNKNOWN AMOUNTS), if we trouble to go carefully through all the known biblical figures for this period. It is evident that the 480 years cannot cover fully the 553 years + X years. At the best, it could be a selection from them, or else it is a schematic figure (12 x 40 yrs., or similar)."
(p. 702. Vol. 2. K. A. Kitchen. "The Exodus." David Noel Freedman. Editor. The Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York. Doubleday. 1992)
Still later, Kitchen suggested that a period of 591/596 years elapsed between the Exodus and Solomon's 4th year according to chronologies preserved in the book of Judges, that is, when the different reigns are added up sequentially, but he favors that some of the reigns are concurrent not sequential (emphasis mine):
"This possibility becomes in effect a certainty if one goes through the date lines between the Exodus and the fourth year of Solomon, the year he began to build his temple, "in the 480th year" since the Exodus (1 Kings 6:1), we are told. Thus, if that year fell circa 967 (cf. dates in chapters 2 and 4 above), a literal adding up would set the Exodus in 1447. But if we take the trouble to actually tote up all the individual figures known from Exodus to Kings in that period, they do NOT add up to 480 years. But rather to 544+x+y+z years, where x= unknown length by Joshua and the elders (minimum, 5/10 years ?), y= rule by Samuel above his stated 20 years (possibly zero), and z= the full reign of Saul (minimum, [3]2 years). The total comes to between 35 and 42 years at least, bringing the 554 years to a minimal 591/596 years. This is certainly not identical with the 480 years of 1 Kings 6:1."
(pp. 202-203. Kenneth Andrew Kitchen. On the Reliability of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2003)
If we add Hoffmeier's 600 years and Kitchen's 591/596 years to Solomon's 967 BC we come up with an Exodus date ca. 1567 BC, and 1558/1563 BC. Pharaoh Ahmose I who _expelled the Hyksos_ is dated by Clayton ca. 1570-1546 BC (p. 100. "Ahmose I." Peter A. Clayton. Chronicle of the Pharaohs. London. Thames & Hudson. 1994). Thus using the "findings" of Kitchen and Hoffmeier regarding 1 Kings 6:1, an Exodus in the days of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos is indeed possible. However, neither of these men understand the Exodus is the Hyksos expulsion, they opt for a Rameside Exodus despite the research they did on 1 Kings 6:1 revealing that the Bible preserves an earlier date for the Exodus. A note of interest: I am unaware of either Hoffmeier or Kitchen stating that the earlier dates for the Exodus that they found in Judges and Kings align the event with Ahmose I's reign and the Hyksos. After identifying the earler date they dismiss it as they are both committed to a Ramesside Exodus. The same failure to align the earlier Exodus date with Ahmose I's reign also holds for Goldstein (cf. above).
Note: Because Professor Kitchen prefers to see some of the reigns in the book of Judges as not sequential but concurrent and thus "lowering the interval of time" between the Exodus and Solomon's 4th year, he NEVER makes the observation that Solomon's 4th year of ca. 967 BCE + 591/596 years = an Exodus ca. 1558/1563 BCE, falling in the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I (ca. 1570-1546 BCE, cf. Clayton's 1994 Egyptian Chronology) who expelled the Hyksos (the first century CE Jewish historian Flavius Josephus claiming that the Hyksos expulsion is the Exodus).
Another scholar, De Vries, had made earlier, similar observations about 1 Kings 6:1(emphasis mine):
"It should be pointed out, moreover, that the chronology demanded by the books of the Judges and Samuel actually far exceeds the figure of 480 years. As will be seen from Table 3, a total of 554 years plus two periods of unknown length occupy the interval from the Exodus to the founding of Solomon's temple. Josephus evidently based his estimate of 592 (Antiq. 8.3.1) or 612 (Apion 2.2) years for this period upon this observation (cf. Acts 13:18-21)."
(p. 584. Vol.1. S. J. De Vries. "Chronology of the Old Testament." G. A.Buttrick. Editor. The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible. Nashville. Abingdon Press. 1962)
De Vries noted two periods of unaccounted length, the period of Joshua and the Elders (Judg. 2:7) and the length of King Saul's reign, noting a "full number" was lacking ( 1 Sam. 13:1). He renders these two anomalies as "X"
and "Y" in his formula thusly:
554 yrs. + X + Y + 966 BCE (Solomon's 4th yr) = 1520 BCE and "EARLIER" for the Exodus.
De Vries, in passing, alluded to another important "dating marker" but did not directly employ it in his article, the historical schema preserved in Acts 13:18-21 which provides us with the length of Saul's reign, 40 YEARS, missing from De Vries' "Table 3", equation "Y" and the missing data on Joshua and the Judges, equation "X":
Acts 13:18-21 RSV
"And for about FORTY YEARS he bore with them in the wilderness. And when he had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land as an inheritance, for about FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS. And after that he gave them judges until Samuel the prophet. Then they asked for a king; and God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for FORTY YEARS. And when he had removed him, he raised up David to be their king..."
(Revised Standard Version. Bruce M. Metzger & Herbert G. May, editors. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977)
The above verse suggests that after 40 years wandering by Israel under Moses, Israel is in possession of the Promised land for 450 years, THEN Judges are given to Israel. THEN Saul rules for 40 years. According to 1 Kings 2:10-11, David reigned 40 years. And the The Temple was built in Solomon's fourth year. Thus we have 40+450+40+40+4= 574 years elapsing from the Exodus to Solomon's fourth year CONTRA 1 Kings 6:1 statement that 480 years elapsed. Solomon's 4th year being fixed by some scholars as 966/967 BCE + 574 years= 1540/1541 in the days of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos.
Lamsa's English translation of the Aramaic Bible renders Acts 13:17-22 thusly, suggesting 450 years elapsed under the Judges:
"The God of this people of Israel chose our fathers and exalted and multiplied them when they dwelt as strangers in the land of Egypt, and with a strong arm he brought them out of it. And hed fed them in the wilderness for forty years, And he destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, and he gave them their land for an inheritance. And for a period of four hundred and fifty years he gave them judges until the time of the prophet Samuel. Then they asked for a king, and God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for a period of forty years. And when in time God took Saul away he raised up to them David to be their king..."
(George M. Lamsa. Translation of the Aramaic Text of the Peshitta. Holy Bible From the Ancient Eastern Text. Harper & Row San Francisco. [1933], 1968)
Doig (1990), using chronological data in the books of Judges and Kings (as well as Acts 13:16-22) argues that 585 years elapsed from the Exodus to Solomon's 4th year (Which is for him 968 BCE). Thus for Doig the 1552 BCE Exodus falls in reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos (Kenneth F. Doig. "The 1552 Exodus." Published in The Journal Catastrophism and Ancient History. Los Angeles. July 1990. pp. 147-157). http://doig.net/OT_Chronology.htm
Till (1990), independently of myself, also surmised 574 years elapsed from the Exodus to Solomon's 4th year as preserved in Acts 13:16-22 contra 1 Kings 6:1's 480 years. He also wrestled with the text in that it suggested to him that after having been in Canaan for 450 years God gave Israel Judges, but he noted that the text neglects to say how long the Judges reigned. Till, citing other scholars' research suggested they reigned for not less than 250 years. Till did _not_ attempt to identify which Pharaoh reigned at the time of an Exodus possessing 574 years instead of 480 years elapsing. I note that 574 + 966 (Solomon's 4th year) = 1540 BCE, falling in the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos.
Till:
"Is the Bible the work of perfect harmony that inerrancy believers claim it is? Suppose we let the Bible speak for itself and see what answer we get. I Kings 6:1 says that work on the temple began 480 years after the exodus from Egypt: "And it came to pass in the _four_hundred_and eightieth_year_ after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon's reign over Israel, in the month Ziv, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of Jehovah (Yahweh)." But the Apostle Paul made a speech in Antioch of Pisidia in which his math contradicted this statement: "The God of this people Israel chose our fathers, and exalted the people when they sojourned in the land of Egypt, and with a high arm led he them forth out of it. And for about the time of _forty_years_ as a nursing-father bare he them in the wilderness. And when he had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land for an inheritance, for about _four hundred_and_fifty_years_: and after these things he gave them judges until Samuel the prophet. And afterward they asked for a king: and God gave unto them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for the space of _forty_years_. And when he had removed him, he raised up David to be their king; to whom also he bare witness and said, I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after my heart, who shall do all my will," (Acts 13:17-22).
With nothing else considered, the 40 years in the wilderness and the 450 years that the Israelites had the land of Canaan for an inheritance before the advent of the judges total 10 years more than the 480 years of I Kings 6:1. _Eerdmans_Bible_Dictionary_ states that the period of the judges "could not reasonably be reduced to less than 280 years," (p. 610). Saul, as Paul noted, reigned as king for 40 years, as did also David who succeeded him (I Kings 2:11). So if we add the four years that Solomon reigned before work on the temple began, we have 40 + 450 + 280 + 40 + 40 + 4, for a total of 854, a significant variation from the 480 years claimed in I Kings 6:1. Even if we let Paul's 450 years for the inheritance of Canaan include also the advent of the judges, as some translations strain to do, his chronology will still total 574 years, almost a century longer than what was claimed in I Kings 6:1."
Dr. Meyers on Acts' 450 years being assigned to Judges:
"Acts 13:20 clearly states that the time period of the judges was 450 years. There are some textual problems with where to place the 450 years. Some scholars say because of the Alexandrian text it is the total of the time in Egypt plus the 40 years in the wilderness plus 10 years for Joshua to conquer Canaan, but no ancient writer that we have looked at takes this view. The years in Egypt were not 400, and the time for Joshua is much longer about 25 years. Jackson and Lake state, "The Western and Antiochian texts and the majority of the modern editors think the 450 ought to refer to the period of the judges" (1979, 150). Ropes explains that the variations were probably intended to prevent the reader from misinterpreting the 450 years as the time being spent to conquer Canaan (Barrett 1994, 633; Courville 1971, 7). The 450 years seems to be the addition of all the judges including Eli (339 years) and the years of oppression (111 years; Lightfoot 1979, Vol 4, 118; See Table 8). Josephus seems to follow this addition as well as most of the other ancient Jewish writers and Church Fathers."
"All of the early church fathers stated that the exodus was more than 480 years from the founding of Solomon's Temple, except Eusebius. Others said 595 years from Solomon's Temple placing the exodus around 1561 BC All except Eusebius say Ahmose is the Pharaoh of the exodus who expelled the Hyksos from Egypt (Manetho 1940, 115; See Tables 5-7)."
Professor Witherington prefers the 450 years to refer to 400 years in Egypt, 40 years wanderings, 10 years to conquer Canaan:
"Verse 19 continues the positive theme, indicating that God cleared the land of Canaan of seven nations (cf. Deut. 7:1) in order to give Israel its inheritance "for about 450 years." This would seem to be arrived at by adding 400 years in Egypt to the 40 in the wilderness and another 10 for the conquest of the land."
(p. 410. Ben Witherington. The Acts of the Apostles, A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, Michigan. William B. Eerdmans. 1998)
In a footnote Witherington acknowledges that some texts clearly identify the 450 years as the period of the Judges but rejects these texts as being "clearly inferior":
"The Western text is clearly inferior here, suggesting that there were judges for 450 years! See Beginnings, 4:150-51, but cf. Rope's views in Beginnings, 3:121." (note 211. p. 410. Witherington)
We have an interesting dilemma here for Conservative Christian Apologists who claim the Bible is inerrant and is to be trusted. Which Bible do we believe? The Aramaic Peshitta's text of Acts 13:17-22 suggesting Israel is ruled by Judges for 450 years or the RSV claiming 450 years elapsed before the Judges came to power? Both texts can't be right. Which text do we believe on how long Saul reigned, 1 Samuel 13:1 or Acts 13:21? If the Holy Texts are inerrant how to explain the "missing data" on Saul's reign WHICH IS PRESERVED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT?
1 Samuel 12:25; 13:1-2 RSV
""But if you still do wickednes, you shall be swept away, both you and your king. Saul was...years old when he began to reign; and he reigned...and two years over Israel. Saul chose three thousand men...
The Septuaginta omits 1 Samuel 13:1 and its data about Saul altogether:
"But if ye continue to do evil, then shall ye and your king be consumed. And Saul chooses for himself three thousand men..."
(p. 371. 1 Kings 12:25- 13:2. Lancelot C. L. Brenton. The Septuagint With Apocrypha: Greek and English. Peabody, Massachusetts. Hendrickson Publishers. Reprint of 1851 edition published by Samuel Bagster & Sons Ltd., London)
Acts 13:21 RSV
""And for about FORTY YEARS he bore with them in the wilderness. And when he had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land as an inheritance, for about FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS. And _after that he gave them judges_ until Samuel the prophet.Then they asked for a king; and God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for FORTY YEARS."
Acts 13:21 then CONTRADICTS 1 Kings 6:1 which avers 480 years elapsed between the Exodus and Solomon's 4th year in that it has 574 years elapsing. Which text does one believe, Kings or Acts, they both can't be right?
The Septuagint's rendering of 1 Kings 6:1 also CONTRADICTS the Massoretic Text's 480 years, for it has 440 years elapsing:
"And it came to pass in the FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTIETH YEAR after the departure of the children of Israel out of Egypt, in the FOURTH YEAR and second month of the reign of king Solomon over Israel..."
(p. 450. 3 Kings 6:18. Lancelot C. L. Brenton. The Septuagint With Apocrypha: Greek and English. Peabody, Massachusetts. Hendrickson Publishers. Reprint of 1851 edition published by Samuel Bagster & Sons Ltd., London)
Of course, the Apologists have an answer. Only the original texts called "autographs" were inerrant but they no longer exist (How handy- we have no original texts to know what God "really" said). Later texts, over hundreds of years became riddled with man-made scribal errors and emendations. The problem with this rationale or "apologia"? It recognizes that God or his Holy Spirit were _unable_ to keep the Holy Texts error-free. Satan "the father of error" _has triumphed over God and the Holy Spirit_ by introducing to the Holy Texts man-made errors. How do we distinguish a text written by Satan as opposed by one written by God? Simple. Because Satan is the "father of error," he is incapable of composing a text that is error-free. Error is his hallmark. God on the otherhand is all-knowing and makes no error. So his compositions "ought to" stand out from Satan's by being error-free. But this is not the case with the Bible. ALL biblical recensions are riddled with errors, revealing they are not God's work, but Satan's doing. Because I do not recognize the Bible to be God's word, I also am sceptical of all its chronological data. Please click here for my article explaining why the Bible cannot be God's word.
Another "observation" is neccesary, just how reliable is the chronology in the Bible? One must admit that the following numbers which possess a "4" seem rather "odd," or "fishy" as if the compilers are "playing with" this number:
4004 BCE the Creation of the earth (Ussher's calculation appearing in some King James Version Bibles).
430 years in Egypt for Israel (Exodus 12:40)
400 years bondage in Egypt (Genesis 15:13)
40 years wanderings in Wilderness (Acts 13:16-22)
480 years Exodus to Temple's Building at Jerusalem (1 Kings 6:1 Massoretic Text)
440 years Exodus to Temple's Building at Jerusalem (1 Kings 6:1 Septuaginta Text)
450 years Judges rule in Israel (Acts 13:16-22, Aramaic Peshitta Text)
40 years Saul rules (Acts 13:16-22)
40 years David rules (1 Kings 2:10-11)
4 years of Solomon's rule then Temple built (1 Kings 6:1)
Yet, when the above data is added up the Exodus date falls in the reign of Ahmose I who expelled the Hyksos.
The above statement is suppossedly from Paul, who claimed to possess Jewish priestly training and knowledge. Evidently there existed in Paul's times Jewish notions of a chronology at variance with 1 Kings 6:1 and its 480
years.
I note that according to 1 Kings 2:10-11, David reigned 40 years:
"So David rested with his forefathers and was buried in the city of David, having reigned over Israel for forty years..."
We are told that in the fourth year of Solomon the Temple was begun (1 Kings 6:1).
So, when we add up the totals from Acts 13:18-21, 1 Kings 2:10-11, and 1 Kings 6:1 we have 40 yrs in the Wilderness, 450 years to Saul, 40 yrs for Saul's reign, 40 yrs for David's reign, 4 yrs for Solomon and the temple, for a grand total of 574 years between the Exodus and the Temple's founding. Add this to 966 BCE when the Temple was begun, and we have 1540 BCE for the Exodus date, on the "testimony of the sacred writings" of the Jews and Early Christians.
Although the above establishes a "possible" Exodus date of ca. 1540 BCE and connects this date with the Hyksos Expulsion, there are other dates which need to be considered.
Josephus gives two different number of years for the period between the Exodus and the Temple of Solomon (ca. 966 BCE), 592 years (Antiquities 8.3.1) or 612 years (Against Apion 2.2). When these dates are added, 612 + 966 = 1578 BCE whereas 592 + 966= 1558 BCE.
So, we have for possible Exodus dates: 1520+ (De Vries), 1528+ (Goldstein), 1540 (Mattfeld & Till), 1552 (Doig), 1558+ (Josephus & Kitchen), 1563+ (Kitchen), 1567+ (Hoffmeier), 1578 BCE (Josephus).
Another problem in establishing a date for the Exodus is that Egyptologists are not in agreement amongst themselves about the dates for the reign of Pharaoh Ahmoses I (rendered by various scholars as Ahmes/Ahmosis/Ahmoses/Ahmose) who expelled the Hyksos.
In Albright's article, he alludes to Parker preferring 1557-1532 BCE, while Helck prefers 1552-1527 BCE (Cf. p. 56, William F. Albright. "Some Remarks on the Archaeological Chronology of Palestine before about 1500 B.C." in Robert W. Ehrich. Editor. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. 1954, 1965, reprint 1971. ISBN 0-226-19443-4).
Other dates are championed for Ahmoses I reign: James Breasted (1912. A History of Egypt) argues for 1580-1557 BCE. Alan Gardiner prefers 1575-1550 BCE (p. 443. Egypt of the Pharaohs, Oxford University Press. 1961); Krauss favors 1539-1514 BCE.
So, we have dates ranging from 1580 to 1514 BCE for Ahmose's reign depending upon the authority being cited, Egyptologists sometimes refer to these varying theories under the term of "High, Middle and Low Egyptian Chronologies." Into Ahmose's varying regnal dates, 1580 to 1514 BCE we can "plug-in" varying Exodus dates ranging from 1578 to 1520+ BCE.
Acts 13:18-21 in conjunction with 1 Kings 2:10-11 and 1 Kings 6:1, gives an Exodus in 1540 BCE, Josephus provides us with 1558 BCE or 1578 BCE all of which fall within the 1580 to 1514 BCE dating range for Pharaoh Ahmose I's reign.
I have attempted to argue that a careful reading of the internal chronology of the Hebrew Bible when combined with, evidently, 1st century CE Jewish traditions preserved by the Early Christians (Acts 13:18-21), pinpoint the Exodus as being a phenomena of the mid-16th century BCE, the same century that witnessed the Hyksos Expulsion.
How does one account for Jewish traditions preserving a chronology placing the Exodus in the reign of Pharaoh Ahmose I (also rendered Ahmes, Ahmose, Ahmosis, Ahmoses) who expelled the Hyksos?
I suspect that the Expulsion of the Hyksos and the conquest of Canaan by Ahmose and his successors was such a traumatic event, that this date became a "cornerstone" marker for subsequent histories or chronologies. Canaan after 1540 BCE became the vassal of Egypt, subject to tribute, and her peoples were hauled off to Egypt to serve as slaves building the mighty monuments of the glorious New Kingdom Era. Evidently later generations broke up this block of time (from 1540 BCE) into artifical segments, 4th year (Solomon's building of the Temple), 40 years (David's reign), 40 years (Saul's reign), 40 years (Wanderings), 480 years (1 Kings 6:1), perhaps due to some kind of religious fascination with "numerical mysticism" ?
It is my understanding that the fictionalized Pentateuchal narratives have creatively re-interpreted, transformed and modified the Hyksos Expulsion into a new story, "the Exodus," telling how a merciful God saved his people and brought them to their Promised Land.
If the above suppositions are correct, it follows that Israel was not in bondage for 400+ years in Egypt, that is fiction. The Hyksos ruled Egypt for approximately 200 years until defeated and expelled. They fled along the Way of the Philistines, back to Canaan with the Egyptians in pursuit. There was no crossing of the Red Sea, or journey to Mt. Sinai (Horeb) or invasion of Canaan from Trans-Jordan in the 16th century BCE.
Excavations at Heshbon reveal it didn't exist before 1200 BCE, which doesn't surprise me as I hold the account to be fictional of the war with Sihon the Amorite. The excavations of course, serve as a marker that the Pentateuchal account was written some time after 1200 BCE and the settlement of Heshbon.
I understand that Liberal scholars rejected the Pentateuch's 1540 BCE or 1446 BCE dating schema because they believed that the mention of the town of "Ramses" in the Exodus account (Ex. 12:37) must be a "historical marker," dating the event to the reign of Rameses II 1290-1224 BCE) who founded Per-Rameses, which they believed was the biblical Ramses. The presence of the town Ramses was a "marker" allright, a marker that the text was composed after 1290-1224 BCE, not that the Exodus event must be in the 13th century BCE!
Redford's investigations led him to conclude there was one event only in the whole of Egyptian history that could account for a "historical kernal" behind the Exodus and that was the Hyksos expulsion under Pharaoh Ahmoses I and I concur with his analysis:
"Despite the lateness and unreliability of the story in Exodus, no one can deny that the tradition of Israel's coming out of Egypt was one of long standing. It is found in early poetry (e.g., Exodus 15) and is constantly alluded to by the prophets...There is only one chain of historical events that can accomodate this late tradition, that is the Hyksos descent and occupation of Egypt...And in fact it is in the Exodus account that we are confronted with the Canaanite version of this event...we may say that the memory of the Hyksos expulsion did indeed live on in the folklore of the Canaanite population of the southern Levant. The exact details were understandably blurred and subconsciously modified over time, for the purpose of "face-saving." It became not a conquest but a peaceful descent of a group with pastoral associations who rapidly arrived at a position of political control. Their departure came not as a result of ignominious defeat, but either voluntarily or as a flight from a feud, or yet again as salvation from bondage."
(pp. 412-413. Donald B. Redford. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times, Princeton University Press. 1992)
Redford suggested that certain elements or motifs in the Exodus were drawing not only from the Hyksos era but the Amarna and Ramesside Eras as well, he noting that Manetho had identified the Israelite Exodus with events that seemed to align with Pharaohs Akhetaton through Rameses II. Osarsiph was identified with Moses by Manetho:
"From what has been adduced to this point it is clear that the first half of Manetho's Osarseph tradition (the "A" pattern) descends from an etiological tale bearing on the Amarna period of Egyptian history. The story probably originally concluded with the 19th Dynasty kings Sety I (Merneptah) and his son Ramesses II finally putting and end to the Amarna interlude; thus it would conform to the revised king list of later Ramesside times, in which the four "Amarna" reigns are excised and their years added to Horemheb, so that the 19th Dynasty follows Amenhotep III immediately...The fate of the victims in the Osarseph legend differs from that of the Hyksos. The latter were expelled through war, whereas the lepers were enslaved. It is from Osarsiph or its prototype that the "Bondage" tradition of Exodus originated."
(p. 416. Donald B. Redford. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times, Princeton University Press. 1992)
Redford on the Hebrew's adopting the Canaanite folk memories after settling the land:
"It is ironic that the Sojourn and the Exodus themes, native in origin to the folklore memory of the Canaanite enclaves of the southern Levant, should have lived on not in that tradition but among two groups that had no involvement in the historic events at all -the Greeks and the Hebrews. In the case of the latter, the Exodus was part and parcel of an array of "origin" stories to which the Hebrews fell heir upon their settlement of the land, and which, lacking traditions of their own, they appropriated from the earlier culture they were copying."
(p. 422. Donald B. Redford. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times, Princeton University Press. 1992)
Redford also suggested that the geography of Egypt as portrayed in the Old Testament, was that of Saitic Egypt, the 7th through 6th centuries BCE, surmising that the text had been written either in the Exilic or Post-Exilic period:
" We cannot escape the conclusion that the narrative genealogy, like the tabular, reflects a sixth to fifth century placement of peoples and states. It is essentially the view of the world that the Jews carried with them into Exile, slightly modified by their descendants who returned to their native land three or four generations later...Whoever supplied the geographical information that now adorns the story had no information earlier than the Saite period (seventh to sixth centuries B.C.). The eastern Delta and Sinai he describes are those of the 26th Dynasty kings and the early Persian overlords...In short, with respect to geography of the Exodus, the Post-Exilic compiler of the present Biblical version had no genuinely ancient details. He felt constrained to supply them from the Egypt of his own day and significantly perhaps, cited several places where Asiatic elements and especially Judaean mercenaries resided in the sixth and fifth centuries."
(pp. 407-410. Donald B. Redford. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times, Princeton University Press. 1992)
For my own part, I would disagree with Redford about the Primary History, Genesis-Kings, being Post-Exilic in its final version. I have argued it was composed in the Exile, circa 560 BCE. Please click here for my arguments.
Hoffmeier, who argues for a Ramesside Exodus in the days of Rameses II, rejected Redford's above analysis :
"I cannot disagree with any one of these points, except that Redford thinks these events derived from the Hyksos experience in Egypt- their migration, period of dominance, followed by their forced exodus. For him a particular group of Shasu (Bedouin) who lived in Sinai and the Negev are the forebearers of Israel. This tribe embraced the story of the exodus as their own. The problem with this interpretation, like that of Halpern, is that the Israelites recall little or nothing of their own origin but know about the Hyksos from a thousand years before. The essentials of the Hyksos story are recalled, Redford speculates, and then they were combined with Persian-period data from Egypt to create the biblical narratives. I find this model to explain how the story of Genesis 39 to Exodus 14 was formed requires a greater leap of faith than to believe the narratives are historical in nature and were preserved by Hebrew scribes, beginning toward the end of the Late Bronze Age."
(p. 226. "Concluding Remarks." James K. Hoffmeier. Israel in Egypt, The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. New York. Oxford University Press. 1996)
Assman (an Egyptologist at Heidelberg University in Germany) suggested, like Redford, that the Israelite Exodus was a conflation and recasting (via inversions) of several events, the Hyksos Expulsion and the Amarna Era when Pharaoh Akhenaten attempted to promote the worship of only _one god_ the Aten/Aton (Emphasis mine):
"Freud's ingenious observation links up perfectly well with the relationship between the biblical account of the Exodus and what was to be considered the historical evidence for it. The historical evidence for a longer sojourn of Syro-Palestinian Semites in Egypt IS THE HYKSOS OCCUPATION, when the foreign invaders reigned as kings over Egypt, eventually to be expelled by an Egyptian dynasty. These events came by NARRATIVE INVERSION to be shaped into the story of slaves that were able to escape slavery and were elected by God to become a people and even have kings of their own."
(p.150. Jan Assmann. Moses the Egyptian, The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard University Press. 1997)
Assmann on the Aten's influence on Judaism (Emphasis mine) :
"Whereas the Heliopolitan priests worshipped the sun god as the highest god and creator of all, Akhenaten proclaimed him to be the ONE and ONLY god: 'YOU SOLE GOD BESIDE WHOM THERE IS NO OTHER.' There is only one possible conclusion to draw: If Moses was an Egyptian and if he communicated his religion to the Jews, IT MUST HAVE BEEN AKHENATEN'S the ATEN RELIGION."
p. 153. Jan Assmann. Moses the Egyptian, The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard University Press. 1997)
Assman seems to suggest that the Sun-god, the Aten (Aton) was transformed into, or assimilated with Yahweh. Of interest here is a verse metaphorically speaking of Yahweh RISING AND SHINING in the East from Seir (somewhat like the sun rises and shines in the east) to lead his people from Egypt, eastwards to Mount Sinai and the Promised land:
Deuteronomy 33:1-2 RSV
"This is the blessing with which Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death. He said, "The Lord came from Sinai, and DAWNED from Se'ir upon us, he SHONE FORTH from Mount Paran..."
Some scholars understand Seir is the mountainous region on the east side of the Arabah valley extending from the Dead Sea to the Gulf of Aqaba. I note that this mountian range terminates at Gebel Faranj near the port of Aqaba. Is Gebel Faranji Mount Paran? The above verse suggests for me that as Israel breaks camp each morning she takes her bearings by waiting for the sunrise which leads them ever eastwards from Egypt to Mount Sinai and to Seir and Mount Paran (Gebel Faranji?). The sun is then metaphorically likened to being Yahweh rising and shining in th
